<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>long and short</title>
    <link>https://longandshort.org/topics/tarot/</link>
    <description>Recent writing from long and short.</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>

    
      
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 &#43;0000</lastBuildDate>
      
    

    
    <atom:link href="https://longandshort.org/topics/tarot/index.xml"
               rel="self"
               type="application/rss+xml" />
    

    
    <item>
      <title>Tarot&#39;s roots and use</title>
      <link>https://longandshort.org/short/notes/note-tarot-root/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 &#43;0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://longandshort.org/short/notes/note-tarot-root/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
In popular culture, Tarot is generally portrayed as part of the
fortune-teller&amp;#39;s toolkit. Divination is primary, and Michael Dummett
et al. tell us that before Tarot started to be used for that purpose
the decks were used in games of chance, much the way modern playing
cards are.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I doubt most Tarot readers, even the ones who may think they&amp;#39;re &amp;#34;a
little bit psychic,&amp;#34; believe the cards possess special powers. Their
value, rather, lies in a kind of provocation, in bringing to the
surface critical events, personalities, and relationships of
importance to the customer, or subject. They believe there is value in
reading the cards so as to make the subject conscious of people and
issues that might escape notice otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This use of the cards is different from fortune-telling, because it
doesn&amp;#39;t claim to predict anything with certainty but rather affords an
opportunity to interpret a cluster of notions surrounding events,
personalities, or relationships that are of importance to the subject.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>

    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
